Taught by Professor of Philosophy James D. Reid, of the Metropolitan State University of Denver, this course traces the revolution in ideas that marked the transition from the medieval worldview to modern rationalist thought, which forms the foundation of science, law, and ethics. The course focuses on Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz, as well as influential but lesser-known philosophers.
Early Modern Philosophy: Descartes and the Rationalists
Four centuries ago, bold thinkers put reason in the driver’s seat. Meet the rationalist philosophers who changed the course of the modern world.
Rated 4 out of
5
by
BaruchCXXI from
The content Spinoza, Leibniz
'How does a mixed marriage work?'
asked friend of my father one dinner time. My father was married as an Agnostic, a Physicist of Jewish Ancestry, chased from his culture by Hitler, married to an Irish Roman Catholic. No man I knew, such as my father believed more in Heimat, not as a social entity, not indeed as a national artefact but as a cultural communion of Wisdom.'
He replied
' We are not a mixed marriage. My wife and I are united Ethically, The rest is flummery, rituals, pageants, ceremonies to celebrate a formula of words, but if one sees those words as functions, as diverse ways of articulating the same concept,, according to cultures and personalities, knowledge and experience, then devotion to an Ethical autonomy is secure from piety and fanaticism and literality. To see a marriage as mixed, is to place provenance above essence.'
Another time he said, on being asked about Quantum Theory
'
A Quantum shift is a saucy little garment , it reveal s a plethora of charms, a semantic shift is made of flannel
and again
'I see a straight line of Ethics from Christ to Kant via Luther via Maimonides Spinoza, Pascal and Diderot.Whilst I do not subscribe Luther, in many respects, but once one transforms words into concepts, once we look at the functional meaning of words in their rhetorical contexts then Love, Faith Ethics, Wisdom, Liberty,, are a common culmination of diverse idiom and concepts and Jesus was as categorical in his imperative as Kant... For Spinoza God was just a term, just as for Isis her head dress connoted not a throne but Power. Her very name in Greek is Energy. Love your neighbour is central to every statement of human rights, however differently the currency of the expression. What Luther did was the eleusis of Ethical Autonomy from the hades of the Universal church..
On grace he said to a Catholic priest and a congregational minister, .for our house was a popular venue for the religious,,
'Grace is living in contnt with the laws of Thermodynamics.'
The title of John Mortimer's auto biography was ]nA voyage round my father.'
I have followed many courses, including this one, and all have been valuable and informative ,insightful. One does not attend a lecture for information but perspective, for an insight through the prism of another's synoptic contemplation.. I came to this course because as valuable as the other course have been in grinding my own prism, I was aware of a Gap in the address to the problems that other courses not; not illuminated, not even mentioned, Descartes is common to all a sort of Terminus, a Gare St. Lazare of lines of thought, setting out or culminating in Je pense donc Je suis. Cogito ergo sum Spinoza, Leibniz. Stations of the Ankh. My own regret, since he mentioned him so often during the course, is that he did not extend to Kant, or Pascal I am a Marxist predicated on Kant not Hegel, If you invert Hegel you have Kant., without Ethics you have alienation rather than saper aude , one has Anomie, or the destruction of self. Anomie rather than a life of Grappling with the challenge. Qui suis je. Is capable of being translated Who do I follow if suivre is used instead of értre.
I was grateful for this course, it filled a gap,not as completely as I hoped ,with Kant,but, even so Spinoza, Anne Finch, and Leibniz is no mean offering with which to grapple and I thought the course interesting, if difficult. It requires several visits which is why it is a good idea to subscribe to the wonders of the world in The Great Courses. There is not another resource like it,,but I wish Professor Reid had been sitting in that green room with the window onto that red brick wall with the creeper because I have grown fond of that room, comfortable with its humanity, I felt at home, however for this course perhaps a tutorial style was rather more apt than lectures.. I will not go into detail about the contents but my review establishes a provenance and a scope. I understand my father' rather better now.
Date published: 2024-11-28
Overview
About
James D. Reid is a Professor of Philosophy at the Metropolitan State University of Denver. He received his PhD in Philosophy from the University of Chicago and has taught ethics and the history of philosophy there and at several other schools. He received a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) to support translation work on Martin Heidegger and an NEH award for scholarship in German Romantic philosophy and poetry. He is an author, editor, and translator and the series cofounder and editor of the Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy and Poetry.
Trailer
01: Philosophy at the Dawn of the Modern Age
Explore the intellectual climate in the 16th and 17th centuries, when early modern philosophy took off. What makes this philosophical movement modern? And what connects it to ancient and medieval philosophy? Professor Reid previews the thinkers covered in the course, and examines their connection to the ongoing Scientific Revolution and the concurrent Reformation that was dividing Christians.
31 min
02: René Descartes’s Quest for Certainty
A pioneer of early modern philosophy, René Descartes set the goal of building a foundation for knowledge that is absolutely certain. Trace the chain of reasoning in his Meditations on First Philosophy that led him to the self-evident truth of his own thinking existence. From this foundation, he demonstrates the existence of God. Look at other conclusions reached by Descartes in this remarkably subtle work.
36 min
03: Descartes’s Method and Motives
Why was Descartes so obsessed with certainty? Delve into The Discourse on the Method, which includes an intellectual autobiography. A key step was the time he spent alone in a stove-heated room, when he concluded that a single individual using reason can get closer to the truth than the aggregate of learning contained in all books. Follow the revolutionary deductions he reached by applying this method.
30 min
04: Elisabeth of Bohemia and Cartesian Ethics
In his Discourse, Descartes outlines a provisional moral code, but the full development of his ethical system emerges through his correspondence with Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia. A gifted philosopher, she posed challenging questions that prompted him to rigorously refine his ideas. Their colloquy explored happiness, virtue, emotions, and the passions, with a strong emphasis on practical ethics.
31 min
05: Lady Anne Conway’s Vitalist Metaphysics
Descartes’s works prompted Lady Anne Conway, a reclusive English noblewoman and philosopher, to set down her own ideas, which bridged metaphysics, ethics, and theology in sharp contrast to Descartes’s system. Drawing on her posthumously published treatise, Dr. Reid summarizes her influential critique of Cartesian dualism and her vitalist conception of all reality, which incorporates reincarnation.
33 min
06: Baruch Spinoza on God and Nature
While Descartes argued that mind and body are two distinct substances, Baruch Spinoza, proposed that there is only one substance, which he identified as God or Nature. Everything else, including mind and body, are modes or expressions of this one substance. Spinoza’s God is not a personal deity but an infinite, impersonal substance that encompasses all of reality.
31 min
07: Spinoza on Mind and Emotion
Continue your study of Spinoza’s Ethics by focusing on his philosophy of mind, notably his theory of emotions. Spinoza held that despite their fluid nature, emotions are far from random or irrational. Instead, they are part of the natural order, arising from encounters with external objects or events that affect the body, which in turn affects the mind. This was a highly innovative view at the time.
32 min
08: Spinoza on Bondage and Freedom
Spinoza’s theory of emotions leads to his account of bondage and freedom. Bondage relates to actions over which we have no control, while freedom is detachment from those emotions that hold us captive. These represent two opposing ways of living—one that results in frustration and suffering, and another that brings fulfillment and peace. The latter is the fundamental goal of his Ethics.
32 min
09: Nicolas Malebranche’s Occasionalism
After reading Descartes, priest and philosopher Nicolas Malebranche broke with the medieval Scholastic view, which was inspired by Aristotle, and developed his own doctrine of occasionalism. This integrated Cartesian metaphysics with a vision of divine intervention. Although rooted in a theistic framework, Malebranche’s ideas influenced later, more secular thinkers such as Hume and Kant.
26 min
10: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz on Truth and Being
A co-inventor of calculus with Isaac Newton, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is best known as a philosopher who built a unified explanation of reality. He called his explanatory agents monads—indivisible, non-physical entities that account for being, perception, consciousness, and other natural phenomena, and play a key role in Leibniz’s understanding of truth. Explore this powerful and subtle system.
33 min
11: Leibniz on Morality and the Problem of Evil
In his satire Candide, Voltaire makes fun of Leibniz’s idea that God has created “the best of all possible worlds.” What led Leibniz to this conclusion, and how does he account for the obvious shortcomings of the universe, notably evil? Examine his distinction between metaphysical, physical, and moral forms of evil. And consider his views on freedom, moral choice, and the aspiration to perfection.
30 min
12: Rationalism Then and Now
In this last lecture, Professor Reid asks how the thinkers presented in the course shed light on today’s debates. Although early modern philosophers often disagree, they are committed to reason as the only hope for a more truthful way of inhabiting the world. Being philosophers, they accept that on matters of fundamental philosophical importance, reasonable people should be free to disagree.
30 min
